In the Press

Protections for LGBTQ Workers Won’t Work Unless Enforced (Newsweek)

Ann Olivarius op-ed, Newsweek


There are three changes that—if implemented by Congress—would improve enforcement of the Civil Rights Act for the better, giving victims including LGBTQ workers more power to hold employers accountable for wrongdoing. 

First, Congress should extend the time period for employees to file complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency tasked with enforcing anti-discrimination laws.  

Second, Congress can expand the narrow definition of discriminatory harassment that now denies many victims justice. To win a claim of harassment under Title VII, employees currently must prove that they were subjected to a hostile work environment so “severe or pervasive” that it materially worsened their conditions of employment. While this standard prevents lawsuits based on employers’ insensitive but ultimately inconsequential conduct, it can also cut off genuine victims of subtler forms of harassment.  

Finally, Congress should allow employees who are not part of a minority group to sue employers who permit discriminatory conduct to occur at work. For example, some workplaces may include a lot of racist jokes and slurs, but now only a black employee, a direct target, can sue for redress. It should be everyone’s right to sue employers who do not do enough to curtail racist or other discriminatory conduct, which can be offensive and corrode workplace relationships for people outside the target group. 

A rising tide of better enforcement can lift all boats—whatever their captain’s gender identity, sexual orientation, race or national origin. It’s time for Congress to take these simple steps. 

I will always be grateful for your unwavering support of me. Equally, I will always be grateful for showing me how to find my voice and strength.

Title IX case against UCLA, client confidential

It was such a weight off our shoulders; suddenly somebody else with a lot more experience was managing the case.

Sandeep Mander, Mander v. Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead

We really thought that there was nothing that anybody could do for us. We were wrong.

Dr Celeste Kidd, Aslin et al v. University of Rochester et al

To get the result you got you must be as tough with your legal opposites as you are kind and understanding to your clients.

AOA client, confidential

Compared with other law firms I’ve worked with, no one matches the combination that McO has of experience, brilliance, ferocious fighting and deep empathy for their clients.

Dr Holly Atkinson, Atkinson et al v. Mount Sinai Health System, Inc. et al

Because my case could not bear public scrutiny, a very powerful institution used massive financial resources to try to crush me for asking for my disability rights. This was a huge mistake, as they didn’t know that I would obtain McO representation. I couldn’t ask for better representation.

Disability Rights client, confidential

I would like to say from bottom of my heart, thank you. Thank you to all the team. Now I can go and forget my former employer. God bless you all.

Unfair Dismissal client, confidential